ShrekJohnson27 t1_iy4epun wrote on November 28, 2022 at 5:50 PM

Reply to comment by Chief_Beef_ATL in Encouraging self-harm to be criminalised in Online Safety Bill by speckz

You can’t seriously expect this to be enforced clearly, anyone applauding this is asking for trouble but can’t see very far down the line

Chief_Beef_ATL t1_iy4f8ne wrote on November 28, 2022 at 5:54 PM

If it makes it easier to call it online harassment, then do that.

ShrekJohnson27 t1_iy4kqdf wrote on November 28, 2022 at 6:30 PM

If you seriously can’t see the consequences of enforcing a vague thing such as this I’m alarmed

Chief_Beef_ATL t1_iy4nsuk wrote on November 28, 2022 at 6:50 PM

Harassment laws have been around for a long time, even if you cannot understand them.

ShrekJohnson27 t1_iy4oo1b wrote on November 28, 2022 at 6:56 PM

But not in a setting like this. You are one of the ones who deserve to get arrested in a misinterpretation of this type of law

Chief_Beef_ATL t1_iy58nss wrote on November 28, 2022 at 9:07 PM

So now misunderstanding a law is an arrestable offense? Wow, I hope you dont actually work anywhere near a courtroom or in law enforcement.

ShrekJohnson27 t1_iy5a86f wrote on November 28, 2022 at 9:17 PM

Misinterpretation by those enforcing it is what I meant, it’s too slippery of a slope besides allowing them to legally be even more invasive on people and in this case children online. Large set of issues

Chief_Beef_ATL t1_iy5cpi0 wrote on November 28, 2022 at 9:34 PM

We need to invent some sort of gathering of people who understand the laws and decide how they are applied. Let's call it a court of law. Wait a minute...