Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

prometheus2508 t1_iy95xwx wrote

Can you elaborate on your feelings of this source?

3

Sajun t1_iy97uh3 wrote

"Since its inception, many environmental scientists and academics outside of the institute have criticized Breakthrough's environmental positions.[12][13][14][15][16][17] However, the work and ecomodernist philosophy of the Breakthrough Institute have been well received in some quarters.[18] Popular press reception of Breakthrough's environmental ideas and policy has been mixed. [19][20][21][22][23][24][16][25][26][27]"

6

prometheus2508 t1_iy981jp wrote

"Some people aren't happy about them" is all that reads.

Jesus, blocked me over that?

Now he's got his porn throwaway involved. Dude, the wiki hardly lists substantive criticisms. Which one bothers you: nuclear energy, industrial agriculture, or seeking a breakthrough in fighting climate change?

−5

Sajun t1_iy9b2h4 wrote

Not really, but okay.

edit: lol I don't even have a porn throwaway on Reddit.

2

uraffuroos t1_iyb2g9p wrote

aren't happy thus debunked LOL some people on here right

1

Throwawaywowg t1_iy9hsgi wrote

Dude just read the shit for yourself god it’s not hard he linked it to you.

−1

dr_taco_wallace t1_iya6ncf wrote

> Can you elaborate on your feelings of this source? >

They're a genocide denialist and fascist sympathizer, totally obvious before even checking their comment history.

> https://old.reddit.com/r/Marxism_Memes/comments/x3kn2o/no_i_dont/imruxua/?context=3 > > Still waiting for the uyghur genocide proof.

−11

CHBCKyle t1_iyap0co wrote

You’re a vaush fan. This guy is your people. It’s not like he’s denying the Holocaust. A lot of socialists feel the same way about the Uyghur issue (for the record I don’t have a stance)

4