Comments
heckdditor t1_ixi63i1 wrote
We call them prisons.
QuestionableAI t1_ixj0ndj wrote
prisons?
[deleted] t1_ixj26wr wrote
[removed]
Solo_Wookie t1_ixn5kdt wrote
Maybe building huge unnecessary office complexes in what amounts to the corporate equivalent of dick waving was not the smartest idea.
ikonoclasm t1_ixowzci wrote
Exactly. They have major tax breaks based on having those headquarters filled with employees that spend on local businesses to offset the tax breaks. Without people in the office, those tax breaks are going to get revoked and the giant useless buildings are going to become much more expensive.
WoollyMittens t1_ixgfjg2 wrote
Forcibly filling their campuses is a sunk cost fallacy.
nick0884 t1_ixgxfkk wrote
Social capital! BS. Try contacted office space that can't be offloaded: so we'll drag people in to fill it rather than pay for it to be empty.
018118055 t1_ixi3jmv wrote
It's probably still better to mothball the offices and work remote. This is just executive pride at work.
heckdditor t1_ixi6bhc wrote
They can also sell or rent the workplaces. There ks also an option to donate to charity.
Leiryn t1_ixjamm5 wrote
Only way they would ever consider charity is if it made money
Heres_your_sign t1_ixfv756 wrote
They invested in palaces. For the companies that planned better, remote working is a strategic advantage. Period.