Submitted by marketrent t3_yngrg9 in technology
TesNikola t1_ivae5n5 wrote
Reply to comment by Professional-Swim-69 in U.N. urges Musk to safeguard human rights at Twitter by marketrent
This conversation continues to be one-sided. I certainly don't hear anyone floating the consideration that maybe, just maybe, the work that the AI ethics team was doing was not actually in line with the connotation attached to the title.
I realize this is going to be hard for a lot of hardcore twits to understand, but maybe that precious platform has long since been corrupted through one-sided views leading to very ineffective ethics policing.
This situation is turning out no different than a number of the major police incidents in the recent years where the public had their judgment and trial finished before the prosecutor even had charges filed.
Conversations like these should probably be stowed for awhile until he has time to see whatever his intentions through a bit. I realize that the intent may be completely ill here. One thing that is unarguable though, is that it's way too soon to know either way.
So I can comfortably sit back and laugh at all of these people projecting their hate of the takeover with their blatantly one-sided personality. I struggle to understand why so many give so much of a fuck anyhow. It baffles me how so many people want to dump so much of their existence into social media platforms anyhow. They are literally tools of the very billionaires they say they hate.
Professional-Swim-69 t1_ivafsjg wrote
It could be like you're saying, it's a possibility
I have never used personally as an account Twitter, or Facebook, or TikTok or Instagram
Reddit granted and LinkedIn because kinda of a necessity for jobs
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments