Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixok7p7 wrote

If you clicked on the articles you’d be aware they are for premium subscribers for PM. Since it seems this argument is ill intended I’m sure you didn’t.

You can look at the rest of the website and realize that it’s compromised by multiple people including NYT journalist and professors.

0

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixokexo wrote

> If you clicked on the articles you wrote you’d be aware they are for premium subscribers

I haven't written any articles...

But do you think a staff writer gets away with three articles in three years?

>realize that it’s compromised by multiple people including NYT journalist and professors.

I expect that to be just as true as your first one...

2

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixokmux wrote

Typo. Either way the article is spot on the report is late by nearly a month now.

0

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixol48t wrote

This is the type of logic I comment on ufo threads for...

Just a string of unrelated claims you either refuse to prove or just can't.

It's the "shotgun" approach to logic

4

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixolfn8 wrote

Your complaint isn’t even on the content of the article. Tim McMillan was a journalist for PM linked you to his article list. You can take a look at the staff for Debrief.

Skeptics argument now that multiple countries including NASA have established research efforts are having a hard time grasping they were wrong.

https://www.gov.br/en/government-of-brazil/latest-news/2022/official-ufo-night-in-brazil

−1