Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixoejlb wrote

One of the journalist that is the most reliable on this topic in the most recent years, Christopher Sharp, has stated that the report hasn’t been given to Congress and that his sources have stated it’s missing the transmedium aspect.

Devices that the Pentagon has encountered able to travel in space, atmosphere and the ocean.

22

Test19s t1_ixopyod wrote

> space, atmosphere and the ocean

I know I shouldn't have picked "Transformers movie" as my respawn location.

6

Roundcouchcorner t1_ixonliv wrote

Acronym’s in a title don’t work for me, I still don’t know what UAP is.

5

tommy7154 t1_ixooc0e wrote

Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon...or a UFO

And ODNI = Office of the Director of National Intelligence

6

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixopyob wrote

Wait until next year it will be UAUP.

Unidentified aerospace undersea phenomena because these devices are also seen in the ocean and it takes into consideration space.

4

QuestionableAI t1_ixsi5ti wrote

Well, the military touched it so they decided to rename it ... I'm just surprised they didn't name them something like

Operation Freedom Identity Risk Flying Thingies ... or some such.

2

Roundcouchcorner t1_ixt9pz8 wrote

I only figured out the first one because of the seal. If you’re not familiar with the field acronyms make it difficult to understand. It’s a weird industry flex, IMO…

1

drche35 t1_ixoiho8 wrote

TLDR?

1

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixoj7h0 wrote

The pentagon was supposed to release a classified report to congress on October 31 and an unclassified report to the public.

As of right now neither report has been given to congress or released to the public.

This report is supposed to release every year until 2026.

10

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixoheco wrote

This is the first time I've seen that blog not be posted by the person running it.

I was hoping the mods banned it

0

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixohm41 wrote

It’s not a blog. They are compromised of journalists who left Popular mechanic.

5

fuckeetall t1_ixp1qd0 wrote

Most brilliant use of ‘compromised’ I’ve ever seen, kudos

5

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixoiato wrote

Weird...

So it's a coincidence this one happens to be written by the blog owner founder and he's never worked at popular mechanics?

Did he finally hire another writer?

0

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixoift6 wrote

Tim McMillan, and many other people write on this website outside of Micah.

Including journalist who are freelancers for NYT.

5

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixoisuq wrote

An ex cop that's now apparently a "co-founder"?

I'm not seeing where he wrote for popular mechanics either

It sounds like there's a third one, want me to check if they've written for Popular Mechanics?

3

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixoiwld wrote

Seems like lazy googling by your part.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/author/224223/tim-mcmillan/

9

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixoj8t2 wrote

Nice, thanks!

Three articles about UFOs...

Did you mean this blog was co-founded by someone who wrote less than a handful of freelance ufo articles that Popular Mechanics website ran?

That sounds believable....

2

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixojdf0 wrote

You can look at their rest of their staff

6

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixojwal wrote

But... You said:

>They are compromised of journalists who left Popular mechanic.

You showed me on ex-cop who only writes about UFOs and has three stories on a website...

He didn't "leave" Popular Mechanics if he was a freelancer...

Shouldn't it be easy to give me a name of someone who actually worked there and now writes for this blog?

7

fuckeetall t1_ixp1wu7 wrote

Why on Earth are you guys acting like having written for PM is a valid credential? Are you experts at dramatic irony?

1

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixok7p7 wrote

If you clicked on the articles you’d be aware they are for premium subscribers for PM. Since it seems this argument is ill intended I’m sure you didn’t.

You can look at the rest of the website and realize that it’s compromised by multiple people including NYT journalist and professors.

0

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixokexo wrote

> If you clicked on the articles you wrote you’d be aware they are for premium subscribers

I haven't written any articles...

But do you think a staff writer gets away with three articles in three years?

>realize that it’s compromised by multiple people including NYT journalist and professors.

I expect that to be just as true as your first one...

2

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixokmux wrote

Typo. Either way the article is spot on the report is late by nearly a month now.

0

Jaded_Prompt_15 t1_ixol48t wrote

This is the type of logic I comment on ufo threads for...

Just a string of unrelated claims you either refuse to prove or just can't.

It's the "shotgun" approach to logic

4

DragonfruitOdd1989 OP t1_ixolfn8 wrote

Your complaint isn’t even on the content of the article. Tim McMillan was a journalist for PM linked you to his article list. You can take a look at the staff for Debrief.

Skeptics argument now that multiple countries including NASA have established research efforts are having a hard time grasping they were wrong.

https://www.gov.br/en/government-of-brazil/latest-news/2022/official-ufo-night-in-brazil

−1

calash2020 t1_ixoq3r2 wrote

Maybe a conspiracy between NASA, the space industrial complex and DOD. If Aliens be real and we know the propulsion system why is NASA spending all this money going to the moon?

−3

Temporary_Draw_4708 t1_ixpg7vg wrote

If aliens have been able to traverse lightyears to visit our planet, their propulsion system would be so far advanced beyond anything we can comprehend that it might as well be magic.

2