Submitted by diacewrb t3_z7rfq8 in technology
Glad-Driver-24 t1_iyays3b wrote
Reply to comment by DirtyPolecat in Social media firms face big UK fines if they fail to stop sexist and racist content by diacewrb
They literally will. You wanna know why? Because literally no company has done it. Every US company, even those that don't even target EU users like US news sites block EU IP addresses because they don't want to comply with GDPR.
The US and UK/EU are not lawless lands, they comply heavily with each other. Imagine if copyright law was incompatible between the two.
DirtyPolecat t1_iyaza6t wrote
If I had the time, I can log onto a European VPN right now and probably find you hundreds of websites hosted inside the US not complying with GDPR but yet are still accessible from inside the EU and give you log files and screenshots and everything. There's way more out there than the big corporate sites that will bend over backwards for any country's laws.
Glad-Driver-24 t1_iyazm11 wrote
As someone who is actually in the EU and actually knows how many US websites either respect GDPR or block, it is the vast majority. Those that don't usually think they're small enough to get away with it. Certainly not when it comes to something like Twitter.
DirtyPolecat t1_iyb0805 wrote
Because the EU is a 700 million person market, and no big company wants to forever sully their potential profit on those people by getting on the EU's bad side. JimbobJamesNews.com however, isn't going to give a shit, and nobody in the US is going after them. The big ones aren't doing it because they're forced to. They're doing it because money.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments