Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

lasdue t1_ixpjuf0 wrote

Is that satire or something, why would you do that instead of a pump and some pipelines?

1

PlayfulParamedic2626 t1_ixpy9eb wrote

Because a pipeline isn’t cost effective to build and maintain. There’s already a road on the route. . .

The truck is fast easy cheap. A pipeline takes years and lots of money to build, install, and maintain.

A truck can carry rock. Be used anywhere anytime. A truck can move materials down several different mountains per day.

3

lasdue t1_ixq0j5x wrote

Sorry man but moving water up a hill with a vehicle sounds stupid inefficient compared to a pipeline for electricity generation purposes.

On top of the weight of the water there’s also the additional weight of the vehicles that takes extra energy to move.

1

PlayfulParamedic2626 t1_ixq1fzc wrote

The water starts at the top of the hill…. The energy is captured through regenerative braking on the trip down the hill….

1

lasdue t1_ixq20ke wrote

There are still losses from transferring the energy from regen to the battery and then taking it out from it again. It’s inefficient and pointless.

1

PlayfulParamedic2626 t1_ixqdki7 wrote

I’m sure you know more than all the engineers at catapillar

1

lasdue t1_ixqh5nx wrote

Caterpillar has absolutely nothing to do with the article/study you linked

1