Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Wh00ster t1_iwmlk0v wrote

… the power of the sun …

7

defcon_penguin t1_iwmn2ob wrote

So, the technology is thirty years away still?

20

Badtrainwreck t1_iwmszdi wrote

What a great setup to a joke, but also yes I am super excited to see where the technology goes. I hope we get to see some cool stuff discovered within the next 50-60 years. I want to die jealous of “kids these days”

3

jxx37 t1_iwmu10z wrote

The energy of the future, and always will be.

3

JamesTWood t1_iwn4tsm wrote

my hypothesis is that higher dimensional phenomena are interacting with the plasma and causing destabilization. i don't think we'll crack fusion until we're able to account for the higher dimensional physics at play, and we won't do that with 3D+1 experiments alone. we're flatlanders trying to make a sphere

−11

MeatBallSandWedge t1_iwn55bv wrote

Meanwhile, you're writing your comment using an electronic machine that is the very pinnacle of all human technology. It wasn't created in a vacuum, it is the sum total of all the research, design, and product manufacturing that came before.
..
..
So much for being happy with less 🙄

14

EclecticKant t1_iwo525u wrote

We are spending so little on "trying to create stars" that, if we don't succeed, aliens won't even be able to tell that we tried. We spend more on most of the most famous sports, we spent more on the football world cup of this year than the entire world spent in fusion research for the last 70 years, we spend a lot of money on absolutely useless things, and you complain about spending an insignificant amount on something that could be a civilization game changer.

6

throwawayqw123456 t1_iwo64ax wrote

If this makes you less hopeful about the possibility of fusion it probably shouldn't. New and well defined problems are usually what lead to breakthroughs

Source: I'm a nucular physiometrist

7

EclecticKant t1_iwoadoy wrote

Luckily we are able to do multiple things at the same time, trying to save the planet and fusion research.

> I don't recall saying we spent too much money on it.

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but doesn't this

> I suggested that maybe we are too arrogant to believe it can be done at all, ergo we should turn our planet saving efforts toward other means.

Mean "we shouldn't be spending our resources on fusion research, and focus those resources on other means to save the planet"? To me it sounds like a suggestion that we spend/spent too much money on fusion, and that we should spend them elsewhere.

4

Formal-Appearance210 t1_iwodlfj wrote

Fusion has been just around the corner for as long as I've been alive.

1

the_zelectro t1_iwof69z wrote

Einstein's handling of a fourth dimension is one thing. He wrapped time and space together, and I'm fine with his model.

A fourth spatial dimension, as string theory and its ilk propose?? I'm not into it

1

the_zelectro t1_iwogjyh wrote

Sure, but evidence does. There's no evidence, therefore making bold predictions on how it relates to fusion is just insane.

I do hope a theoretical breakthrough resolves our issues with fusion. I do not think that we're at the liberty to act like we know what that breakthrough is though

1

CMG30 t1_iwoswbl wrote

Ah yes. Looks like fusion is only 20 years away... And always will be.

1