Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AlexandersWonder t1_ixz7jpz wrote

Reply to comment by ymgve in NASA discovery reveals there may have been life on Mars by Genevieves_bitch

Wait, do you mean to tell me that the title isn’t the article?

^^^/s

43

ALurkerForcedToLogin t1_ixza328 wrote

In this case, the title is the article. Also, we already knew that Mars might have had life on it, simply by the definition of might. This video is a click generator, noting else.

27

PlayfulParamedic2626 t1_ixzh93t wrote

In August 1996, a group of scientists announced that they had found evidence of ancient life on Mars. This evidence included bacteria-shaped objects and organic chemical molecules in the martian meteorite ALH 84001, which was collected in Antarctica.

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/slidesets/marslife/index.shtml

21

Plzbanmebrony t1_ixzu2dr wrote

I don't care about a single possible cell. Show me a group of possible cell and show me that they were eating something in the rock and show me the poop.

6

PlayfulParamedic2626 t1_ixzvk6k wrote

Life on other planets doesn’t need cells.

4

Plzbanmebrony t1_ixzwfnz wrote

Hwat are you talking about. Cells=life. Chemical soup is not life unless it has a cell wall of some sort.

−21

worthwhilewrongdoing t1_iy00yj1 wrote

Our definitions of life match what we've seen, not what it must be.

I'd think that if we saw evidence of some sort of amorphous autonomous chemical soup on another planet moving around and making decisions, we might have to start reconsidering some things.

15

Badtrainwreck t1_iy1n712 wrote

Self replicating Campbell’s soup, it would be endless soup.

I always thought about how when we say “nothing can live in _______” that we could only say that because we can’t imagine what could live in places we see as uninhabitable for us.

2

IamAFlaw t1_iy0o7lk wrote

I can show you my poop. I have a big one in the oven almost ready.

0

straighttoplaid t1_iy1ww7o wrote

Reddit has proven that something can poop, yet still have no life.

3

JaggedMetalOs t1_iy1mkcw wrote

That's not believed to be good evidence of past life on Mars because the objects are tiny, much smaller than any known terrestrial bacteria. Researchers were also able to produce similar shapes using non-biological methods.

It's still possible these are some kind of life much smaller than earth life, but it's thought unlikely.

2

PlayfulParamedic2626 t1_iy1mqqq wrote

You think todays findings are bullet proof?

1

JaggedMetalOs t1_iy2047s wrote

Just tempting expectations, as ALH 84001 is often overhyped as solid evidence of past life on Mars.

2

leoheck t1_ixz9fbm wrote

Wait. Are you saying there is something hidden in the post's picture?

2