Submitted by redhatGizmo t3_yf361j in technology
Comments
Weary-Log-9848 t1_iu2a4f1 wrote
Couldnt they have just made an EU specific model, or removed the port entirely?
ieya404 t1_iu1j012 wrote
> He said that neither Lightning — the current iPhone charging port – nor the now-ubiquitous USB-C would have been invented if that switch had occurred.
Because nobody would ever want to improve connector design if Apple didn't do their own thing, right?
Barroux t1_iu1rmvj wrote
Apple's arrogance has no boundaries
rhysgh t1_iu4gzkz wrote
Does the law require specifically USB C? If so, if that law had been made in the past requiring mini-USB, presumably no one would ever have designed an alternative for phones until the law allowed for an alternative.
Weary-Log-9848 t1_iu6sh94 wrote
You mean no phone company would make their own proprietary connection for profit and nothing else? Sounds great. Charging ports should not be designed by phone companies. Thats the point of this. Not to stop the development of new port.
The U in USB stands for universal, it is developed thru a non profit organization, supported by lots of differeny tech giants (apple included). Its just like how we have standards for wireless charging or wifi. When you go to a hotel, you dont have to worry if they only support "apple wifi", you know that all your wifi enabled devices will be able to connect. Theres little/no benefit to allow companies to do their own thing. Lets get everyones hands on helping develop the next universal standard, instead of working on their own.
rhysgh t1_iu74uve wrote
Charging ports should not be designed by phone companies? Are you calling Apple a phone company? Better get them kick off the USB board then…since Apple is a member.
Some connectors suck, others are good for their time…but all will eventually age out of viability. Both competition and cooperation enable advances like USB-C, but if government removes the choice, how likely is it that there will be any impetus to move towards a newer standard with higher throughput or power capacities? And will this create artificial limits on device capabilities in the future as they limit those capabilities due to the limits of USB-C?
I’ll certainly enjoy having fewer cables to carry at least in the short term.
sjng24 t1_iu77lad wrote
Apple does a lot of things, being the second largest mobile phone manufacturer is one of them.
USB C is a decided standard. Tech decides standards to help progress, not impede it. When a better standard is required, it will be adapted. For now, it is a great standard that doesnt cause any bottlenecks. I have a feeling a new standard will be created before we even come close to a bottleneck with USB C, you are worrying about non-issues.
Edit: yeah, looks like usb c can charge a phone fast enough to damage a standard lithium ion phone battery, and supports data transfer rates of up to 10gb/s. Id say we're good in that department for a while.
stowgood t1_iu1qan9 wrote
Fuck them for not doing it sooner.
sanjsrik t1_iu1kvo0 wrote
Apple, we have years old technology at 5x the price but the fanbois will still use it.
Nekaz t1_iu1w3n3 wrote
Dang was hoping they wouldnt comply so we get some cyberpunk megacorp vs government war up in here
kronicfeld t1_iu21m13 wrote
Oh how gracious of them
Saskanuck t1_iu2idrs wrote
Does it make any sense to have USB-C in Europe and not anywhere else?
Details_Devil t1_iu2k81e wrote
I’m wondering when they go to wireless charging only to avoid this requirement.
woodenblinds t1_iu4hl2u wrote
I thought this as well
sjng24 t1_iu7f8qa wrote
Wouldnt be the first time apple removed a port before the world was ready for it..
Mkedartgw t1_iu5evyl wrote
No one should be thrilled to have governments (especially supranational ones with little accountability like the EU) mandating designs and features. Had it been around in 1995, the EU probably would have mandated compatibility with Microsoft Bob.
Weary-Log-9848 t1_iu6v4c0 wrote
Yeah, hell, lets let the phone companies develop their own wall outlets too! Call the electrician, we need an iOutlet!
[deleted] t1_iu6uqm1 wrote
[deleted]
MarblesAreDelicious t1_iu1hth4 wrote
No! I was fully expecting them to break the law and offer Lightning ports!