Submitted by Saltedline t3_yi7inh in technology
Absolute_Authority t1_iuhg56j wrote
Reply to comment by TheLianeonProject in TSMC reportedly building 1nm chip fab in northern Taiwan by Saltedline
Transistor sizes as '1nm' or '5nm' is just branding similar to Iphone 12 or Iphone 13. They aren't actually physically that small. It did used to actually be the size it was named but precisely because of the slowing pace of innovation you mentioned its become a marketing gimmick.
DavidBrooker t1_iuj8w47 wrote
There are structures at the scale in the name, but which structure they're referring to is ambiguous between different manufacturers (and sometimes generations). Intel's 14nm has similar transistor pitch to TSMC's 7nm process, for instance, and both have transistor pitches on the order of 40nm.
burner9752 t1_iuiz73j wrote
This used to be only true for intel, tsmc was using the correct size to naming scheme in the past.
TheLianeonProject t1_iuhkdbg wrote
I know, but nonetheless, we are approaching a physical limit to the size of transistors.
razorxent t1_iuhnl0l wrote
Always have been
IgnobleQuetzalcoatl t1_iuhspjs wrote
I don't think you knew that given the first sentence in your original comment. I didn't either. After some quick googling, looks like the 5nm process has transistors spaced around 51nm at minimum.
bik3ryd34r t1_iui62os wrote
Isn't 5nm the width of the transistor?
685327593 t1_iui9xko wrote
No, not even close.
Gwthrowaway80 t1_iuiqm4m wrote
Once upon a time those terms were related
Tiny-Peenor t1_iui57mm wrote
It’s okay if you didn’t know. Hell, I didn’t know
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments