Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Gagarin1961 t1_ityhu55 wrote

Well yeah, now we know what they want it for. “Yessss, keep uploading all your code to our free service hosted on our servers so we can use it to train AI to code.”

34

VietQuads t1_ityj8iv wrote

Was there an initial backlash to this acquisition?

27

yaosio t1_ityrt1x wrote

Bad code helps it too. The amount of data used to train a model is far more important than the size of the model. Just shove as much unique data in there as possible.

3

marxy t1_ityzast wrote

They are soaking up all of our data as they, no doubt, have with LinkedIn.

−4

theschuss t1_itz9bzr wrote

Small snippets, and I believe they're in the process of cleaning up it's acquisition rules for training. There's a ton of legal precedent around small snippets of "obvious" code being unpatentable (think for loops or iterators)

4

mrpoops t1_itz9w89 wrote

Love the paranoia.

They bought it to replace Azure DevOps…that’s it. That’s the actual reason.

That plan is gonna be far more profitable than web scraping shit code they could’ve mostly accessed freely anyway because most repos are public.

7

Robeleader t1_iu1pl4m wrote

Their new code AI definitely surprised me at their Ignite conference. Basically they have options to make code based on plain-spoken word problems as well as simply software proof-reading.

2

HanzJWermhat t1_iu2qx8o wrote

Not true. Code is protected under IP copywriter law it’s basically treated like a book or piece of music. You have a responsibility to declare its license rights. By default I think it’s no rights even if the code is public. MS or anyone dumb enough to not check for open source licensing before using the code would open themselves up to absurd litigation l.

1