"Zuckerbergberg"... hmmmm...

Secure is not private

Is that like Fred Fred Burger cousin?

[removed]

That means he’s Jewish 2.0. Thanks Kanye

This writer is so far up Zuck’s ass!

...and less secure than Signal.

[removed]

iMessage sends as much information as Facebook Messenger.

[deleted]

The name game: How it works?

Zuckerbergberg, Zuckerbergberg, Zuckerbergberg, bananabana fo Fuckerbergberg, me my mo Muckerbergberg, Zuckerbergberg!

End-to-end the encryption means the carrier cannot read your content. Don’t know how you get more private than that.

To make it truly private the recipient must not be able to read the message either.

Oh, that’s true. Forgot that option.

To be clear, I don’t send a text message or iMessage because it is secure, I use it because it’s convenient. I’m confused as to how anybody ever really thought that iMessage was secure, does anybody actually care?

From what I understand...

and I'm not citing this, so keep your skeptical spectacles on...

They don't read the content of the message, but they take the metadata of it and cross reference it against their other platforms. This means they know who you're talking to (phone numbers) and build contact networks this way. if they can get a positive ID to Facebook or Instagram accounts, they can attach lots of other wizardry to it. They know who is talking, how frequently, and at what times.

Signal and telegram don't have those sorts of associations.

Encryption doesn’t matter when the message is screened before encryption is applied. Anyone remember facebook’s patents?

It does not. Apple does not share who you contact how often for example, now say the same for messenger