Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

tmp04567 t1_itycza2 wrote

It's currently a driving assist (it can do a lot but not everything, esp off roading). Maybe they shouldn't call it a self driving yet. Maybe in 10+ years. Imho it's an advertizing and naming issue. They're at the edge of tech and progressing, but only so much can be done today. A driver need to stay at the wheel to avoid eventual mistakes.

> Tesla, which disbanded its media relations department in 2020, did not respond to written questions from Reuters on Wednesday.

Tssk tssk

13

supercali45 t1_ityi8ej wrote

Doesn’t stop Musk from pumping that lie over and over .. it’s cumming it’s cumming and his lemmings lap it all up over their lips and faces

6

WilliamMorris420 t1_ityj46w wrote

Tesla's Full Self Driving has been commimg later this year or early next year for about the last ten years.

8

random-incident t1_itysbwx wrote

Do you think the hardware is the limiting factor?

−1

ScenicAndrew t1_iu1rggx wrote

Yes, Tesla cars are straight up not equipped to see the world better than a person in the driver seat can, which is kind of sad because human drivers actually have very limited vision. Luckily other autonomous cars are equipped differently.

2

random-incident t1_iu2djtq wrote

Who is the closest to actual full self driving?

1

ScenicAndrew t1_iu31nce wrote

Google Owned company waymo probably on account of them being street legal, had a big study that showed they're quite possibly already past the "better than people" phase, and definitely have better public image so adoption might go easier. But I don't follow all the players. Who knows maybe apple gets there first.

1