Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

musofiko t1_iu7wj2r wrote

What is it a Winnie the Pooh lunch box?

3

Explorer335 t1_iu7yfhv wrote

If the NSA is going public to say this is a threat, it's a BIG problem. That 5G hardware can communicate on huge swaths of the electromagnetic spectrum (far beyond its rating), and those towers have serious power behind them. Imagine a Chinese SIGINT network spanning the entire United States. What could possibly go wrong?

44

Independent_Pear_429 t1_iu86nuu wrote

It's hilarious just how weak the US federal government is sometimes

−7

jphamlore t1_iu88kbk wrote

But I thought China was a technological backwater? How can it be that China has technology superior to what the US can produce?

−11

SpaceTabs t1_iu8rvyf wrote

This isn't about 5G. 5G is acquired by carriers. This is about network cards, switches, routers, cameras... It isn't being checked at purchase and it isn't being measured/assessed in the infrastructure.

"Between 2015 and 2021, at least 1,681 state and local governments purchased equipment and services tied to the five companies named in Section 889. Every state except Vermont had at least one state or local government entity procure ICTS covered under Section 889 (there were also no purchases in Washington, D.C.).

"Collectively, these entities conducted nearly 5,700 transactions involving a wide range of covered equipment including but not limited to smartphones, surveillance cameras, temperature scanners, handheld radios, and networking equipment. Figures 1 and 2 show the total number and value of government transactions that involved equipment from Huawei, ZTE, Hikvision, Dahua, and Hytera in each state. Our analysis relies on data provided by GovSpend, a company that tracks federal, state, and local government procurement"

17

FieldMarchalQ t1_iu8wak6 wrote

Nsa is afraid their own backdoor software won’t work on Chinese equipment 🎈

3

Explorer335 t1_iu9ecft wrote

Huawei, Hikvision, and Dahua gear are really prevalent in my field. The prices are so low on some of the stuff that I swear they must be subsidizing it somewhere. I know those cameras check in with a server in China periodically, and some of them have facial recognition. I'm curious about what all they can do.

7

AlanzAlda t1_iu9g5u8 wrote

The metrics cited, namely spending and number of papers submitted, do not necessarily mean they are "superior".. it means they are spending more and have more researchers working on it.

Quantity is not the same as quality.

7

duffmanhb t1_iu9h7yw wrote

The USA can produce it. The companies were found to be selling it under cost, which made no sense. Then found the pattern that all these below cost units were being placed near secured military and energy installations.

2

Medical_Officer t1_iu9j2u5 wrote

Right... That must be why Huawei led the world in 5G. The Chinese time traveled to steal the tech from future Americans.

After all, we all know that the Chinese aren't great at math engineering or tech.

−5

A_Gent_4Tseven t1_iu9ldmo wrote

Just because a country might not be “superior” in an industry, doesn’t make them any less of a possible security issue… if they know how to use what tech they have and can still inflict the damage they do(can do). They aren’t fucking dumb, Chinese hackers are up there on the US list of constant threats. Which means they’re good at their jobs.

1

AlanzAlda t1_iu9ra8u wrote

From the top of that article.. "Other methods to gauge scientific prowess still put the United States somewhat ahead"

This does not imply your original statement of Chinese research superiority.

5

TeaKingMac t1_iubj68l wrote

>They just stole the technology from other countries.

Nah, US manufacturers gave them the technology in exchange for cheap labor.

At the very least, gave them access to the technology

1

Aviator-Moe1967 t1_iugm6z0 wrote

When are government employees going to be held accountable? Lose their jobs? If there is no consequences for their inaction…..

2