Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

UnhelpfulMoron t1_isdhex0 wrote

Reply to comment by SUPRVLLAN in Apple slapped with a $19 million fine in Brazil for not selling iPhones with a charger by mepper

Which is why this ruling makes no sense to me.

They give you the cord which lets you plug into any usb-c power brick. My house has like 5 of them, some apple some not.

I don’t want another. It’s unnecessary e-waste. The planet dammit doesn’t need every single person who purchases an iPhone to be given another bloody piece of e-waste to go with it.

6

hesaidhehadab_gdick t1_isdszza wrote

okay but now imagine you don't have a charging brick just handy at home, they all broke or you had to move to a new place and needed to restart from scratch. Now it becomes an issue of having to buy another product in order to use the thing you already bought.

−1

UnhelpfulMoron t1_ise0p69 wrote

I’m confused as to how this argument makes any sense.

Yes, if something that you need breaks, you need to purchase a new one.

How does that relate in any way to this situation?

4

hesaidhehadab_gdick t1_isfo3jo wrote

Its not about having one and it breaks and replacing it.

Its about those who just plain don't have one.

You shouldnt have to buy a phone and then buy another product in order to charge that phone.

1

SuppaBunE t1_ise2pzm wrote

That literally what happened to my coworker. She got kick out of her parent hiyse momntook her phone , she buys a new phone, a new samsung, usbc charger cant charge tvw phone now without buying one

2