Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

rayinreverse t1_jdaxnv4 wrote

I mean he literally said he wanted to ban it because it was a threat to national security. I’m no trump fan, but I distinctly remember this.

2

matts1 t1_jdaz97j wrote

Or he was using that as a smokescreen after users of tiktok made him look bad by conducting a campaign to inflate his rally numbers. For one or two of his rallies before the 2020 election, users would signup for tickets to his rallies in the thousands. When they had set things up expecting thousands and only a fraction showed up. Kinda irked him.

He didn't give a shit about "national security" especially since Facebook collects the same "data."

5

rayinreverse t1_jdb03vy wrote

Then the current administration doesn’t either, because no one’s going after Facebook.

2

matts1 t1_jdb0nb2 wrote

I agree but that's because Facebook paid for the lobbying to make tiktok look like the boogeyman. Just because they couldn't compete with tiktok.

Whether or not its really a security issue is up for debate so far as I am concerned. Considering the existence of data brokers. That any country can just buy data from which contains the same stuff that come from apps.

3

poopoomergency4 t1_jdbr4fc wrote

>Just because they couldn't compete with tiktok.

if they took some of the effort and funding out of this "meetings but in VR" concept, they could probably afford to build a viable competitor, but lobbying is cheaper so why bother?

2

matts1 t1_jdea1fs wrote

Oh they tried.. They added features to instagram that they plucked directly from tiktok. People just weren't interested.

2