Submitted by Flawed_L0gic t3_11xt2sd in technology
GreenAdvance t1_jd4wj8w wrote
Reply to comment by enderandrew42 in Judge dismisses gamers’ claims that Microsoft/Activision merger will spoil gaming by Flawed_L0gic
They didn't tell courts (or anyone) that they wouldn't make future Bethesda titles exclusive.
snoringpupper t1_jd50q2p wrote
Microsoft did tell the EU commission they had no incentive to make Zenimax games exclusive.
The EU did not make them "promise" or impose any kind of restrictions but it is indeed a thing Microsoft wrote in a document to them.
KhellianTrelnora t1_jd5osge wrote
And this is when the world realized that a clear motive is only needed for a murder.
GreenAdvance t1_jdacq9b wrote
"We won't do x" and "We don't have a profit motive for x" are not the same statements.
"We won't do x" is not something Microsoft wrote in a document to anyone. Their lawyers aren't that stupid.
[deleted] t1_jd588po wrote
[removed]
WALKAW t1_jd9tr9n wrote
Not sure how so much stupidity got upvoted in this thread but im going to say astroturfing. Yes Microsoft did say they have no financial incentive to make Zenimax games exclusive and now are.
GreenAdvance t1_jd9vook wrote
It's almost like those are two separate statements and not what the OP said.
The article I link literally quotes Microsoft's statement you are referencing. I didn't say otherwise.
WALKAW t1_jda9ux5 wrote
They say it here which is what people are referring to.
GreenAdvance t1_jdacj3h wrote
Yeah, and? Did you actually read any of that or the article I linked?
What it says and what OP said are not the same thing.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments