Submitted by homothebrave t3_127qnc5 in technology
nbfs-chili t1_jeg187l wrote
Reply to comment by Boo_Guy in NYPD is refusing to comply with NYC’s new surveillance tech laws by homothebrave
I would think if they tried to use evidence obtained this way, it would be thrown out.
Telid t1_jegld6m wrote
It would be, but parallel construction remains legal. Aka. they can use facts obtained illegally to go find evidence they can justify by saying they could of found it in the first place, and then hide the fact they got the original evidence. If the court or the defense only know about the 2nd facts and not the first, they cannot challenge it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments