Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

DanielPhermous t1_j9oh362 wrote

Reply to comment by 2KoolAwYe in Apple reportedly made a big breakthrough on a secret non-invasive blood glucose monitor project that originally was part of a 'fake' startup by dakiki

Bullshit is easy. Proving it is obviously more difficult.

Shrug.

10

2KoolAwYe t1_j9oi5zp wrote

Proving it would take more effort than it's worth, for someone who is going to clap back with semantics and not understand what I'm saying

The thing that broke me was thinking that there are versions of Mac OS without exploits or malicious software, after you saying that is very clear you're not prepared to listen, so I'm gonna take the downvotes from other pedants that don't want to look things up on here so I can enjoy my day off and not waste time researching on you

2

DanielPhermous t1_j9oll3s wrote

> The thing that broke me was thinking that there are versions of Mac OS without exploits or malicious software

And now you're lying about what I said, as if I can't remember.

"They did have a small amount of malware, however, but no viruses."

This is how you convince yourself you've won? By lying to yourself about what my arguments were?

That is no victory. That's your ego seeking catharsis.

Inbox replies disabled. There's no point talking to someone who will lie to my face about my own words.

6

2KoolAwYe t1_j9oo5kv wrote

No, it's the bit about Mac OS 9/10

This is exactly what I'm talking about

2