VoidAndOcean t1_j85w4ex wrote
Reply to comment by jamesj in Scientists Made a Mind-Bending Discovery About How AI Actually Works | "The concept is easier to understand if you imagine it as a Matryoshka-esque computer-inside-a-computer scenario." by Tao_Dragon
Fine but the matrix is still there.
ActiveTeam t1_j85wjp1 wrote
So by your logic, do we get rid of all psychologists because your brain is just neurons firing and we already know about the low level chemical and electrical interactions happening?
VoidAndOcean t1_j85wvcw wrote
There is no logic. We knew how it worked by design. Its capability was going to grow exponentially because matrices by definition grow exponentially. It's the same basic logic that drives a 10x10 matrix that runs an n*n matrix.
ActiveTeam t1_j85y6p5 wrote
We know exactly how a single neuron activates and how it works. We also know the more densely packed the neurons are, it usually means the smarter the blob of neurons is. Does that mean we don’t need to study anything about the mind?
VoidAndOcean t1_j85ydul wrote
We didn't write the way neurons interact with each other. We did write the matrix and nodes.
gurenkagurenda t1_j8700le wrote
If basic explanations don’t convince you, the fact that there’s a boatload of PhDs studying this subject should give you pause. You probably haven’t figured out based on your vaguely informed reckoning that they’re wasting their time.
VoidAndOcean t1_j871663 wrote
bro i use ml/ai models for my job;
I don't know what to tell you. We know which models to use because we know what it will do.
gurenkagurenda t1_j8777i8 wrote
> i use ml/ai models for my job
Awe inspiring credentials.
VoidAndOcean t1_j877e2t wrote
am I giving a lecture?
This is simply my view.
gurenkagurenda t1_j878gnd wrote
You’re the one who tried to bring up your own modest credentials after I already pointed out that PhDs are focusing on this subject. Don’t get defensive when I point out that they make you sound silly. Your view is wrong.
VoidAndOcean t1_j879don wrote
there are PHDs studying bullshit all the time and research is a waste of time, it doesn't mean anything. That doesn't give or take away from my view.
you are just slightly out of your depth here arguing for sake of arguing. if you don't like an opinion then simply move on.
gurenkagurenda t1_j886jhh wrote
Ok buddy, whatever you say. The fact that you’ve said “matrix” throughout this and consistently referred to them as having a rank of two is telling.
AlpLyr t1_j8660lm wrote
In what sense does ‘matrices grow exponentially’, let alone ‘by definition’?
If you’re takling about the number of entries in an n by n matrix where n increases. That grows quadratically. Fast, but not exponential.
[deleted] t1_j866ktr wrote
[deleted]
aggressivefurniture2 t1_j87h277 wrote
It's called quadratic
AlpLyr t1_j8862bp wrote
N^2 is not exponential, 2^N is.
[deleted] t1_j85whpw wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments