Submitted by rejs7 t3_11bm7gg in technology
[deleted] t1_ja1upmj wrote
Reply to comment by theannotator in The Supreme Court Actually Understands the Internet by rejs7
[deleted]
theannotator t1_ja1uwml wrote
But you can’t really go somewhere else in most cases. It’s a monopoly. Kill 230 or carve out these monopolies and you get a more free market approach.
[deleted] t1_ja1ve0u wrote
[deleted]
theannotator t1_ja1wh0e wrote
Well me hearty, when 98% of the market defaults to you that’s a monopoly. Businesses and the government largely aren’t on the others. Government shouldn’t use a private monopoly of a platform (twitter and YouTube for comma and google for finding info)that isn’t neutral for official communication.
It’s obvious we won’t come to a consensus, but it’s been nice having a discussion that didn’t include ad hominem attacks or bring up certain mustachioed men.
Good day!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments