Submitted by HRJafael t3_11deyb4 in technology
Comments
[deleted] t1_ja89t57 wrote
[deleted]
whatistheformat t1_ja89w7a wrote
To... what?
I read the article, I just still don't get what markets they could meaningfully penetrate. It's a pretty vague reboot.
buttonsmasher1 t1_ja8d0gj wrote
Good. Their phones are jarg.
TheSignalPath t1_ja8fztu wrote
Who wrote this article?! Nokia doesn't make phone. They have licensed the brand name for a while. Nokia is in the network infrastructure business for both mobile, optics and fixed networks. They also have cloud & software products built for networks.
DavidBrooker t1_ja8iq4b wrote
Your use of 'could' seems misplaced. They haven't made a phone in a decade, and have a revenue of 22B euros. I think that's not quite as speculative as you're implying.
Their largest business sector is networking equipment, where it is a major competitor to Cisco and Huawei. It's building a big chunk of America's 5G rollout.
Ground2ChairMissile t1_ja8iuhh wrote
Oof. That logo isn't quite as bad as the new Kia logo, but it's close.
MammothJust4541 t1_ja8jlyu wrote
I would like to see Nokia get into the nuclear bomb shelter business.
DavidBrooker t1_ja8jnp1 wrote
Nokia hasn't made a phone in about a decade. Anything with their name on it in that timeframe was a licensing deal. They dropped smartphones a long time ago, and they don't think the phones with their licensed branding hurts their core brand in core market of network infrastructure.
shinra528 t1_ja8joam wrote
From everything I heard, Windows phones we’re pretty great; just no one was buying them.
[deleted] t1_ja8pv0b wrote
[removed]
duane534 t1_ja8r40m wrote
BB10 was, too. Magic Eraser has nothing on what BB10 did, almost ten years ago, but we live in an app-driven world.
[deleted] t1_ja8w01d wrote
[removed]
mvfsullivan t1_ja8xh6k wrote
It looks like Nocia to me
uacabaca t1_ja95aiu wrote
It's no Kia bad
typesett t1_ja9dzmh wrote
so the same thing that msoft used for Windows worked against them in the mobile phone wars
who had all the software? apple and android
if they dont have the apps at the time they were not pretty great. 'pretty great'? at what? like it was great because it worked? because it ran office? at the time to be great, it needed what people wanted. the latest apps, great camera, new models every year
​
my 2 cents. i love options for consumers so we are just talking about the post-mortem but competition is great
GMW-5610 t1_ja9ouwq wrote
The Metro UI, for how neat it was on mobile, was inevitably associated with the shittiest desktop release of all time. The reputation problem was clear.
zKarp t1_ja9q65p wrote
You're reading it the wrong way.
7
O
^
—
y
[deleted] t1_ja9seml wrote
[removed]
shinra528 t1_ja9t2ym wrote
I don't disagree with any part of your analysis.
xyzzzzy t1_ja9x9c1 wrote
Network gear. Bad article though.
kutkun t1_jaa6ak7 wrote
I wonder how many millions of dollars they paid for the “design” of the name of the company -or of the logo let’s say.
[deleted] t1_jaag8an wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jabpj5c wrote
[removed]
Quantum-traveler88 t1_jabw4az wrote
Lol this was cool in like 2008. Very unoriginal and hipster logo. Reads “lokia”
[deleted] t1_jack2od wrote
[removed]
GMW-5610 t1_ja87kfp wrote
Honestly, they should just drop the ball on smartphones. Thr current models are an embarrassment and an insult to what Nokia used to be.
I will forever hate Microsoft for driving the brand to shit and for actively sabotaging and killing a much needed third mobile OS. MeeGo kicked ass and was way better than fucking Windows Mobile.
So, so ahead in many aspects (design, gestures).