Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

WarriorZombie t1_ja5sh72 wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in A Photographer Who Found Instagram Fame for His Striking Portraits Has Confessed His Images Were Actually A.I.-Generated by PauloPatricio

They are very artistic, not going to lie, but also they look “off”, especially when there are many of them together. You start seeing “fake sameness”

80

OrginalGurgi t1_ja61pq2 wrote

Yeah... kinda like no soul in the eyes.

20

LBraden t1_ja69arp wrote

To be fair, you work perm nights as security for 6 years and ask people if you have a soul afterwards.

20

mudman13 t1_ja9x23k wrote

I worked in car rental for ten years can confirm some people have no soul behind their eyes..especially me after a summer public holiday.

2

[deleted] t1_ja75ixf wrote

> They are very artistic, not going to lie

They are very not artistic, not going to lie. Bland are very generic; as if a AI bot made the - oh wait

1

knigitz t1_ja7g0iq wrote

Art is subjective, bro. You're arguing opinions here.

9

[deleted] t1_ja7k1py wrote

Art is also objective.

Ignoring the act of creation and the artist and their tools, is a mocking of art and its creation.

You're the one being very ignorant and narrow minded. Art is so much more than just "subjective opinion".

Bro

−7

knigitz t1_ja7mk54 wrote

No one is ignoring traditional art or its journey.

But you are ignoring decades of science and technology advancements leading us here, ideas that rang in ears likely before you were even born. You are ignoring countless hours of research and development across numerous organizations, companies, universities, and individuals, the developed workflows of modern web apps, and hundreds of open source libraries working together to reach today's result. You are also ignoring the fact that many artists are actually pro AI workflows. You're stuck in the past.

AI art can be beautiful, especially when you put that tool in a digital artist's hands. You just aren't looking hard enough, or are squinting your eyes shut in disbelief when you witness it.

I'm not attacking traditional art. So only one of us here is being ignorant and a narrow minded bigot (you).

7

[deleted] t1_ja7mur7 wrote

You have no experience of how industrial art really works, do you :)

There's nothing to say, because you have the usual reddit armchair stance on this lol. You have basically no clue what you're talkink about.

−3

RefanRes t1_ja7hg4d wrote

Its not just fake sameness in certain parts. Its that there's inconsistencies which show they dont fit with a photographers usual methods or tools. You can see its not the same camera or lens being used everytime.

1

Weazy-N420 t1_ja7ts3d wrote

The thumbnail pic alone looks like a family. They all resemble one another.

1