Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ImSuperHelpful t1_j9awd5k wrote

Reply to comment by gurenkagurenda in OpenAI Is Faulted by Media for Using Articles to Train ChatGPT by Tough_Gadfly

Except that’s what was missing from your original point, but either way I gave you a starting point… if it’s beneficial for both parties and both parties consent (which content site operators do via robot.txt instructions), no one has a problem. In the AI case it’s beneficial to the AI creator/owner but harmful to the content owner since the AI is competing with them by using their content, so it shouldn’t be considered free use.

−1

gurenkagurenda t1_j9b9muc wrote

>Except that’s what was missing from your original point

Again, it's not missing from my original point, because my original point was to ask how the commenter above was distinguishing these cases. You've given a possible answer. That's an answer to my question, not a rebuttal.

I don't think that answer is very compelling, though. Arguing that an explicitly unreliable chat bot that hallucinates as often as it tells the truth is somehow a competitor to news media etc. is a tall order.

1

ImSuperHelpful t1_j9biixs wrote

I didn’t present it as a rebuttal, I added important context that was missing from your question that makes the answer much more clear.

And these thing are unreliable now, but Microsoft and others are dumping billions of dollars into making them better and they’re doing it for profit. Waiting around until they’re perfected before fighting against the ongoing unfair use of copyrighted content is a sure fire strategy to losing that fight.

1

gurenkagurenda t1_j9bl2kk wrote

What they're dumping money into now on this front are AI enhanced search engines, which are complimentary to the content they're training on.

1

ImSuperHelpful t1_j9brj6f wrote

That’s all they’ve launched on this front, that doesn’t mean it’s all they’re working on

1