nu1stunna t1_j8yke0v wrote on February 17, 2023 at 9:40 PM

Reply to comment by MrMarriott in Google CEO Sundar Pichai asks employees to put two to four hours into helping to improve and 'dogfood' its Bard chatbot by tester989chromeos

I’ve taken chatgpt for a spin and was underwhelmed by the results. It’s possible that I’m not using it “right” but it seems very limited. What you can and can’t ask from it is hardcoded in and it’s really shitty. They are so afraid of being sued, that they won’t allow you to prompt it to criticize religious or government figures, predict sports outcomes, or anything that can be seen as “controversial “. I find that pretty ridiculous. It’s a free AI service, not some expert who is giving advice for money.

SeaweedSorcerer t1_j8yzwdc wrote on February 17, 2023 at 11:30 PM

I think that’s the point. It’s meant to be a demonstration of their capabilities, basically an advertisement, to entice companies to buy their AI products. It’s not a product in its own. Corporations are pretty much always careful to keep their ads inoffensive. Especially when AI chat bots have a history of being taken down within a matter of days when they go off the rails.

Valiantheart t1_j926jmu wrote on February 18, 2023 at 5:47 PM

People are bitching about its biases when returning results too. I've not used it myself, but don't find that surprising.