MrMarriott t1_j8wavws wrote
Reply to comment by opknorrsk in Google CEO Sundar Pichai asks employees to put two to four hours into helping to improve and 'dogfood' its Bard chatbot by tester989chromeos
ChatGPT is literally based on research and work that Google did. Google did the innovative work but OpenAI did a way better job of productizing the work.
https://ai.googleblog.com/2017/08/transformer-novel-neural-network.html
extropia t1_j8x3osi wrote
"Second mouse gets the cheese".
FreezingRobot t1_j8xgytp wrote
Yes, but this all reminds me of the "Xerox invented the GUI" stuff. It's not sure it makes who invents what, it matters who can go to market with it.
Google has been treading water for years, living off stuff they already made and people depend on. When they stop depending on it and/or it gets regulated out of existence, they're screwed.
MrMarriott t1_j8xxxmi wrote
That is a fair analogy, but my comment was in response to the claim Google was trying to catch rather than innovating, which I thought was weird since innovation isn't Google's problem, execution and strategy are.
nu1stunna t1_j8yke0v wrote
I’ve taken chatgpt for a spin and was underwhelmed by the results. It’s possible that I’m not using it “right” but it seems very limited. What you can and can’t ask from it is hardcoded in and it’s really shitty. They are so afraid of being sued, that they won’t allow you to prompt it to criticize religious or government figures, predict sports outcomes, or anything that can be seen as “controversial “. I find that pretty ridiculous. It’s a free AI service, not some expert who is giving advice for money.
SeaweedSorcerer t1_j8yzwdc wrote
I think that’s the point. It’s meant to be a demonstration of their capabilities, basically an advertisement, to entice companies to buy their AI products. It’s not a product in its own. Corporations are pretty much always careful to keep their ads inoffensive. Especially when AI chat bots have a history of being taken down within a matter of days when they go off the rails.
Valiantheart t1_j926jmu wrote
People are bitching about its biases when returning results too. I've not used it myself, but don't find that surprising.
yungplantdad t1_j8xcio0 wrote
Sure, and all of googles search engine revolves around the work of Markhov. They may have done the research, but their product certainly looks less mature.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments