Submitted by turbulance4 t3_10l4mvs in springfieldMO
Wrinklestiltskin t1_j5vlrpm wrote
Reply to comment by turbulance4 in Hawley introduces Pelosi Act banning lawmakers from trading stocks by turbulance4
I think his assumption is the most reasonable seeing as how the Republicans have already prevented a legitimate version of this bill by voting against it. Why should anyone assume this is more than attention grabbing and 'owning the libs' from a well-established jackass?
turbulance4 OP t1_j5vm760 wrote
I didn't research it but I wouldn't be surprised if republicans, in the past, blocked a similar bill from Dems simply because they didn't want Dems to get "a win." That doesn't suggest Reps will also block this bill. If anything the Dems well because they want the "win."
Wrinklestiltskin t1_j5vqvgb wrote
This bill has no chance to pass, and Hawley knows this and drafted it in bad faith.
The Republicans (politicians) aren't going to want this passed and their party's voting history in the matter of regulations such as this or anti-lobbying measures is consistently to vote against it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments