Submitted by SearchingBleach t3_z8joqc in springfieldMO
FrankTankly t1_iydmh7g wrote
Reply to comment by elevationbrew in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
Really? Because Hawley responded to a letter from me indicating that he thought that this particular piece of legislation would negatively impact people that hold traditional conservative and religious values.
How’s that square up with what you’ve said? I agree it’s none of the governments business who I marry, which is why they’ve made a law preventing the ability to discriminate based on race or gender.
Sure seems like that’s them staying out of my private life to me.
elevationbrew t1_iydn7b7 wrote
Post it. Put your ass on the line.
FrankTankly t1_iydvdts wrote
I’ll gladly put mine on the line if you’ll stop talking out of yours.
Edited to add: “I have serious concerns about what this law would mean for the religious liberty rights of Americans who hold traditional, religious views on marriage.”
Straight from his mouth, in case you didn’t feel like reading.
No_Lies_Detected t1_iye2vpt wrote
So which religion is he referring to? It seems this country has a large variety of religions that people worship. Are all of these religions against same sex and interracial marriage? 🤔
Or get this - and it may be a stretch for me to consider this. Hawley is an evangelical Christian and he is pushing those values on to everyone - even those that do not worship in the same manner he does.
Is that even a possibility?!?! /s
FrankTankly t1_iye3prx wrote
Lol, yes, he is clearly concerned about ALL religions, obviously.
Can’t wait for a well thought out, level headed response from the person I responded to. Anyyyyyy minute now I’m sure…
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments