Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

nickcash t1_ivv5p72 wrote

Reply to comment by Netzapper in CRT and Amendment 3 by AttorneyTime4601

> There's a bunch of videos and articles that go into detail

Meh, I think this is vastly overstated. 90% of those videos and articles are like "BattleToads The Way It Was Meant to Be Played!!!!" and then they're showing it on some super high-end sony trinitron from like 2008.

In the 80s, NES was really played on some old wood-paneled monstrosity from the 70s with fucked up color balance, because CRTs lasted forever back then and were too expensive to replace often. It did not look better.

1

Netzapper t1_ivv9swl wrote

I mean, I was there... but I'm not saying that they looked better overall at the time. Our game TV all the way up to like 2000 was fuzzy as fuck, and certainly from at least the early 80's. An LCD is an improvement from that. But so was my $100 college TV from BestBuy.

But the pixel artists of the day really were optimizing around the geometry and physics of TV pixels, and I do think it looks smoother when viewed on a nicely-calibrated CRT than on a similarly-calibrated LCD. Again, this isn't about nostalgia. The artists had high-end CRTs on their desks when they were making the games.

You also get into stuff like the Nintendo Zapper not working on LCDs because of the way it depends on CRT scanlines.

2