Ill be voting for it.

I can't tell completely, but it doesnt seem to have the same issue as Illinois did where you had to pay like 200k and make the case that your business partners are more oppressed/more marginalized than some other applicant so you should get the license instead. (Basically the oppression Olympics)

They seem to have dodged that bullet which is why some of the most social justice "muh equity" groups dont support it because they dont get first dibs on it because of prior historical grievances. (Get in line is my view on that.)

I will admit the "Chief Equity Officer" stuff made me do a double take because anything with "Equity" inserted into it usually means you will be further back in line depending on who can compete better for you in having less privilege.