Submitted by ShadowsNMirrors t3_yp1jbx in springfieldMO
ShadowsNMirrors OP t1_ivh45br wrote
Reply to comment by ShartsvilleDestroyer in Judicial Corruption in Missouri by ShadowsNMirrors
It's right in front of you face....
Here are the Missouri Supreme Court's Rules on when Judge's should recuse themselves:
https://www.courts.mo.gov/courts/ClerkHandbooksP2RulesOnly.nsf/c0c6ffa99df4993f8625
6ba50057dcb8/e14db401df7f552e86256ca6005211b7#RULE%202-2.11%20Recusal
RULE 2-2.11 Recusal
(A) A judge shall recuse himself or herself in any proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality
might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to the following circumstances:
(1) The judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or a party’s
lawyer or knowledge of facts that are in dispute in the proceeding that would
preclude the judge from being fair and impartial.
(2) The judge knows that he or she, individually or as a fiduciary, or the judge’s
spouse, parent, or child wherever residing, or any other member of the judge’s
family residing in the judge’s household is:
(a) a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, general partner, managing member, or trustee
of a party;
(b) acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;
(c) a person who has more than a de minimis interest that could be substantially affected by the
proceeding; or
ShartsvilleDestroyer t1_ivh4ojb wrote
Yeah, I read your whole thing. Still doesn't change my mind. I do not see how his father being one of many employees that are in no way involved in the case means he will be biased or impartial.
Low_Tourist t1_ivhedu6 wrote
His father died in 2018, too. So that makes it even less relevant.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments