Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

the_honeyman t1_itr4279 wrote

Reply to comment by Cloud_Disconnected in Vote NO on Question #1 by [deleted]

Tight, compact development is actually better in the long run for the environment than infinite subdivisions.

11

Cloud_Disconnected t1_itr6ctf wrote

Fair point, but I'd rather a subdivision didn't go in there either.

It's going to get developed one way or the other, I just think it's a shame.

4

the_honeyman t1_itr7v41 wrote

Yea, the subdivision thing was more about continuing to push single family developments towards Rogersville, Ozark, and Nixa because people constantly make interior development such a headache. Even the Grant Avenue parkway caused a ruckus, so I'm not singling out Galloway on that particular issue.

Your second sentence is why something like this, with a developer that is adding back green space into their plan and making it mixed use, feels like something to encourage.

4