Submitted by LeeOblivious t3_11rcme0 in springfieldMO
LeeOblivious OP t1_jcao6uc wrote
Reply to comment by YakAttack_Actual in Does the local police/sheriff enforce bumper height on jacked up trucks? by LeeOblivious
Found the guy with the jacked up truck, truck nuts, and aggressive bumper stickers.
First of all it is NOT victimless/useless. It is a significant safety concern. The higher the bumper is on a vehicle the more likely it is to cause major harm to the other's occupants.
Second it is not extortion to enforce safety rules. Do you believe it is extortion to enforce stop signs, one way streets, working headlights, and other safety requirements?
And finally, you do know the reason for this specific regulation and the history behind it? You do know that back in the day it was not regulated and after several horrific accidents we the people added this rule for a very good reason.
YakAttack_Actual t1_jcaomcv wrote
Ironically no, you found the guy that commutes by bicycle πππ
Yes. Itβs extortion. Of all the car accidents Iβve worked in a 7yr and going career of fire/ems around here guess how many have been caused by a truck over 22β?
LeeOblivious OP t1_jcap9lw wrote
Caused has NOTHING to with it. Simply being in one is enough. We regulate vehicles for safety of everyone. Even those who fail to yield and cause an accident.
[deleted] t1_jchrab0 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jcbb158 wrote
[removed]
LeeOblivious OP t1_jcbbms2 wrote
Evidence for your assertation is not evident, kindly cite.
No_Win6358 t1_jcbd3my wrote
Where's your evidence of your assumptions towards the OP you replied to? That was the whole point of the response, to demonstrate why you shouldn't make such baseless assumptions on others just because you didn't like their response.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments