Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

YakAttack_Actual t1_jcaa7k1 wrote

Yes, because what we need is more law enforcement and more useless/victimless laws to extort citizens withโ€ฆ

−2

LeeOblivious OP t1_jcao6uc wrote

Found the guy with the jacked up truck, truck nuts, and aggressive bumper stickers.

First of all it is NOT victimless/useless. It is a significant safety concern. The higher the bumper is on a vehicle the more likely it is to cause major harm to the other's occupants.

Second it is not extortion to enforce safety rules. Do you believe it is extortion to enforce stop signs, one way streets, working headlights, and other safety requirements?

And finally, you do know the reason for this specific regulation and the history behind it? You do know that back in the day it was not regulated and after several horrific accidents we the people added this rule for a very good reason.

3

YakAttack_Actual t1_jcaomcv wrote

Ironically no, you found the guy that commutes by bicycle ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

Yes. Itโ€™s extortion. Of all the car accidents Iโ€™ve worked in a 7yr and going career of fire/ems around here guess how many have been caused by a truck over 22โ€?

0

LeeOblivious OP t1_jcap9lw wrote

Caused has NOTHING to with it. Simply being in one is enough. We regulate vehicles for safety of everyone. Even those who fail to yield and cause an accident.

4

[deleted] t1_jcbb158 wrote

[removed]

0

LeeOblivious OP t1_jcbbms2 wrote

Evidence for your assertation is not evident, kindly cite.

1

No_Win6358 t1_jcbd3my wrote

Where's your evidence of your assumptions towards the OP you replied to? That was the whole point of the response, to demonstrate why you shouldn't make such baseless assumptions on others just because you didn't like their response.

1