Submitted by [deleted] t3_11g7x6g in springfieldMO
blu3dice t1_jani99c wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Man used drone to fly cell phones into Springfield's Fed Med, prosecutors say by [deleted]
Because it's Federal land! Missouri can't charge him for crimes that occur on Federal property. Do you want the Federal government to prematurely charge him before a complete investigation? Was Springfield Fed Med the only prison he visited? Is he part of a bigger criminal organization?
[deleted] OP t1_janjpes wrote
I never said anything about Missouri charging him. What I did say was he's not being charged for the drone crime. I never said he couldn't be charged in the future. I made a comment based on what is said in the article I posted.
Why_T t1_janycvn wrote
Your comment is very accusatory in that you feel slighted by no charges being filed. That's why people are having issues. Instead of "And yet he's not being charged" you should have something more like "And no charges have yet been filed" Do you see the difference?
[deleted] OP t1_janyub9 wrote
Thanks for your insight.
[deleted] OP t1_jannlfg wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments