Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] OP t1_jan6ebi wrote

And yet he's not being charged with anything pertaining to this. They just want to use to revoke his bond with an Oklahoma court because he wasn't supposed to leave the state.

I'd be interested into what kind of drone he was using.

3

blu3dice t1_janalqc wrote

>As of Wednesday, Simental did not appear to be facing criminal charges in Missouri related to the drone activity.

He's back in custody. Federal prosecutors don't have to rush to file charges.

9

[deleted] OP t1_janfz8e wrote

Yes. But at this time he is facing no charges for what he did with a drone.

−8

blu3dice t1_jani99c wrote

Because it's Federal land! Missouri can't charge him for crimes that occur on Federal property. Do you want the Federal government to prematurely charge him before a complete investigation? Was Springfield Fed Med the only prison he visited? Is he part of a bigger criminal organization?

11

[deleted] OP t1_janjpes wrote

I never said anything about Missouri charging him. What I did say was he's not being charged for the drone crime. I never said he couldn't be charged in the future. I made a comment based on what is said in the article I posted.

−10

Why_T t1_janycvn wrote

Your comment is very accusatory in that you feel slighted by no charges being filed. That's why people are having issues. Instead of "And yet he's not being charged" you should have something more like "And no charges have yet been filed" Do you see the difference?

8

Elios000 t1_jauwuyx wrote

modern cell phone even big one isnt that much weight any old quad could do it

1