cor_dam t1_j67eqmr wrote
Reply to comment by idontreadfineprint in Legendary college basketball analyst Billy Packer, who called 34 Final Fours, dies at 82 by HeStoleMyBalloons
Is that it?
pargofan t1_j687kkc wrote
As an announcer though, I'm surprised he survived that comment in the 90s.
But whether it was racist? Howard Cosell probably wasn't racist and he was using "little monkey" in the 80s for small, fast wide receivers in football. When he used it for black players, it got him forced out.
https://historydaily.org/howard-cosell-little-monkey-controversy
idontreadfineprint t1_j67imf3 wrote
SamURLJackson t1_j67tzal wrote
If you're the one calling someone racist then I think it should be you providing the proof
idontreadfineprint t1_j68r1rt wrote
>If you're the one calling someone racist
I'm not
vaelstresz77 t1_j682ady wrote
Calling a black man a monkey is my proof.
SamURLJackson t1_j69zfqr wrote
He didn't call him a monkey. He used a phrase that was popular at the time and then you used your Racism Detector decoder ring 40 years later and got upset about it.
There's enough problems in the world without inventing more
vaelstresz77 t1_j6ahswr wrote
A popular racist phrase that was used at the time 40 years ago, and is no longer accepted because the majority of the country has decided that it is no longer acceptable to compare black men to monkeys period...
It was racist at the time, it's still racist today. Because you believe it's popularity and frequent use some how makes it not racist, I'm going to say you have some unresolved racism yourself.
SamURLJackson t1_j6alb9p wrote
If the player was white then it'd be ok, though, right?
My point is that it was a phrase people used. It wasn't used on black people exclusively. Examples have been given in this thread of the phrase being used during that era, regardless of race. You've skipped over this and saw "black people" and "monkey" used, and you linked those together. You can argue that you're the one being racist, but I'm not going there.
I'm bowing out of this thread. This is a mess
vaelstresz77 t1_j6alzv6 wrote
Yeah that's kinda how racism works...
vaelstresz77 t1_j67nkfm wrote
"has nothing to do with race".
He is literally saying he does not believe Iverson is human, he believes he is an animal.
What else do YOU need in YOUR mind's eye?
saysthingsbackwards t1_j67q4zs wrote
I'm sorry, you're moving way too quick here. Can you actually spell it out for us, but with more capitalized accentuated words so I know which ones you're simulating jamming your finger into my chest?
vaelstresz77 t1_j67qupb wrote
The fact you consider capitalization to be "jamming my fingers into your chest" is weird.
What was too fast for you?
saysthingsbackwards t1_j67racz wrote
All of it. Can you start over please?
[deleted] t1_j67slhg wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j682025 wrote
[removed]
saysthingsbackwards t1_j6al9kx wrote
I really hope you don't think I was going to read that.
TooRedditFamous t1_j67s5de wrote
That's clearly not what is being said. Sure its racist to refer to a black guy as a monkey but saying "has nothing to do with race" is not a sign that he literally sees him as an animal you dummy. He's literally just making an excuse saying "it's not a race thing".
The implication is clearly not that he wants to finish the sentence "it's not a race thing because he's an animal" it's, "it's not a race thing because I'm not racist" it was just a poor attempt to cover his back
NotBullievinAnyUvIt t1_j6807yn wrote
I actually read it as he sees us all as monkeys. Like the whole evolved from apes deal. But maybe I am giving him to much credit.
[deleted] t1_j67t2ke wrote
[removed]
SirSucculENT t1_j67taxu wrote
You're the worst
[deleted] t1_j67texj wrote
[deleted]
vaelstresz77 t1_j67thku wrote
Care to explain? Or you just spew insults for no reason.
[deleted] t1_j67uw3d wrote
[removed]
vaelstresz77 t1_j67v78b wrote
I wish I didn't delete my other comment to you.
For reference, it said "you're a racist". You have proved my point by literally disregarding thousands of years of racism that was solely focused on the oppressed not being human beings.
Jesus Christ Almighty, you must have been "educated" in the south.
[deleted] t1_j67yr3v wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j69xv3a wrote
[removed]
vaelstresz77 t1_j67v0w7 wrote
You are fooling yourself to think racists don't believe they are animals. Why compare a person to an animal otherwise?
vaelstresz77 t1_j67w3jl wrote
Tell me, since you are so well versed on the subject of racism. What is the "all encompassing definition" of racism.
Please. Tell me how racists view the people their racism is directed at.
cor_dam t1_j68sghs wrote
Dude it’s called a metaphor. He is not literally saying the player is a monkey. Sometimes people call someone a monkey as a slur. Sometimes they do it to make a comparison that describes how athletic someone is.
vaelstresz77 t1_j68v3a8 wrote
You're right, it's a metaphor for not being human....you know being an animal.
cor_dam t1_j68w36o wrote
Which is not racist. In this context, it’s a compliment because monkeys are superior to humans in the traits that he’s comparing. Michael Phelps is sometimes called the “flying fish” because he, like fish, is a good swimmer.
vaelstresz77 t1_j696w9i wrote
You are so detached from reality saying it was a compliment.
Phelps being called a fish isn't even comparable you psycho.
cor_dam t1_j69jnnj wrote
Resorting to gaslighting/insults and no argument, can’t say I’m surprised. I think it’s pretty clear from the responses you’ve received who is detached from reality.
vaelstresz77 t1_j69kyti wrote
Says the person that believes calling a black man playing sports a monkey is not racist.
Go read this to any black person and ask them what they think.
cor_dam t1_j69nneu wrote
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1996/mar/03/billy-packer-apologizes-for-remark/
Iverson and his (black) coach both said they were not offended and do not consider him racist.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments