Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

STRIpEdBill t1_j31pnvs wrote

Reply to comment by LovelyDadBod in Canada defeats rival U.S., advances to world junior gold-medal game against Czech Republic by Genevieves_bitch

Lol both those were obvious goaltender interference, luke Hughes turn over on the empty better was a perfect representation of team USA's play

9

LovelyDadBod t1_j32iwy9 wrote

I’m a goaltender, have been since I was 8-9 and still play regularly in my 30’s. I also ref.

First one is only interference strictly by the IIHF rules. North American refs would have called it a good goal as it was really incidental contact that also wouldn’t have happened if the D-man didn’t hit him towards the goalie.

Second one was 100% a no-goal

1

Hascus t1_j32lm7n wrote

Exactly, first one is a goal in the NHL for sure

2