Galaxyy_G t1_itavrwy wrote
Reply to comment by YOBlob in Curtis Campher scores 72 not out and leads Irish victory over Scotland in Irelands highest ever run case by Risc_Terilia
So you took a generic term and compare it to a more specific term lol, maybe compare it to 'the batter got bowled out with only 5 runs' and I think most people would understand it.
OldIndianMonk t1_itq95tz wrote
I saw yesterday one dude claiming how NFL is much bigger than the soccer World Cup because his friends and neighbors don’t watch it!
Superbowl(the final game) brings in 100m views. Cricket and Soccer matches bring in views in the billions.
Americans are funny, man!
YOBlob t1_itc1lrx wrote
I don't think most people in the world would, no. Hence the confusion any time there's a cricket post on r/sports.
MitchyJohno t1_ite4hh6 wrote
You realise r/sports is not a good representation of the world right?
Of course an American dominated site is going to understand American football more than cricket.
YOBlob t1_itffuuo wrote
Most of the world doesn't understand cricket.
MitchyJohno t1_itfyhsp wrote
Most of the world doesn't understand nfl. What's your point?
YOBlob t1_itjkmeb wrote
My point is that most of the world doesn't understand cricket, so people should stop getting buttmad every time there are confused comments on cricket posts on r/sports. I don't know why that's apparently such a controversial position.
MitchyJohno t1_itkjlp8 wrote
If that's your point you should have communicated it better as saying nfl is less niche than cricket is wrong or at least debatable.
YOBlob t1_itkmhzj wrote
Not my problem if you can't read.
DeadassYeeted t1_iu6lxox wrote
You literally said NFL is less niche than cricket though
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments