Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Korvun t1_ispuvuz wrote

Reply to comment by twombles21 in Dodgers vs. Padres score: Padres win in dramatic Game 4, eliminate Dodgers by YnwaMquc2k19

Why would I read a different conversation to get more context for THIS conversation? Especially when the additional context you've given ALSO sounds like bullshit? She does LITERALLY NOTHING, but is constantly randomly verbally accosted? Give me a break, man.

If you leave your house and run into an asshole, you've run into an asshole. If you leave your house and everyone you run into is an asshole, YOU'RE the asshole.

And you may not have outright said all fans, but you sure want to punish all Padres fans because "the ones you encountered" that day were assholes. Now, if a person wanted to levy a punishment to an entire group of people for the bad behavior of a few, what would that make the guy wanting to punish everyone?

1

twombles21 t1_isq4f99 wrote

You stated that I said all Padres fans are a piece of shit . I was providing proof that your statement was untrue and pointing you to evidence of that.

Stop saying I’ve said things that I haven’t. You are using hyperbole to try and make it seem like I’m purposefully making unrealistic and exaggerated claims.

I did not say my wife is constantly verbally abused. Merely that she has been verbally abused on more occasions than the average person because she’s small and quiet.

I only said I hope the Padres lose and mostly because I was angry about how we were treated by more than one isolated Padres fan. Now, notice I said more than one. Not many, not most, not all. What I said will have zero effect on how the Padres actually perform. I’m not doing anything to punish anyone.

Perhaps instead of getting all defensive, you should have gone with something like “Don’t lump all Padres fans together. We aren’t all bad!” unless you were just looking for a reason to argue.

1

Korvun t1_isqieqq wrote

>Stop saying I’ve said things that I haven’t. You are using hyperbole to try and make it seem like I’m purposefully making unrealistic and exaggerated claims.

I used your own ridiculous story to make your story sound unrealistic, no hyperbole needed.

>I did not say my wife is constantly verbally abused. Merely that she has been verbally abused on more occasions than the average person because she’s small and quiet.

You're splitting hairs. You said she has a history of it, now you're saying it's more common than the average person. You can argue with my use of constant if you like, but the point is the same. You're full of it.

>Perhaps instead of getting all defensive, you should have gone with something like “Don’t lump all Padres fans together. We aren’t all bad!” unless you were just looking for a reason to argue.

Your idea for not being defensive is to say something defensive? I'd rather just keep calling your BS stories what they are, BS.

1

twombles21 t1_isqrda8 wrote

“I used your own ridiculous story to make your story sound unrealistic, no hyperbole needed.”

Your use of constant to change the narrative to better suit your agenda says otherwise.

“You said she has a history of it, now you're saying it's more common than the average person..”

You act like those two statements are opposing ideas and can’t possibly both be true simultaneously.

As I said before, you can believe what you want. My story is true whether you believe it or not. Unless you work at Petco Park as security and have access to security camera footage with audio, nothing you can say will change that.

1

Korvun t1_isr3nk3 wrote

>You act like those two statements are opposing ideas and can’t possibly both be true simultaneously

Actually, I used those two statements to make the point I did. That you're implying consistency.

>As I said before, you can believe what you want. My story is true whether you believe it or not.

You see, now I said at the beginning that your story is plausible, but that you've chosen to omit key elements in the story, like your part in it. Given that you've instead chosen to say, "nuh uh, we're as innocent as the driven snow" instead, I'll just stick to my original conclusion. Have a blessed day.

1

twombles21 t1_isr9spa wrote

Your error is assuming that there were key elements that were omitted without even having the ability to prove that is the case, not to mention having zero knowledge about the person who said it. Yeah, I’m the one who is full of it. 🙄

“Have a blessed day”. Oh, that explains so much about you. Thanks for that.

1

Korvun t1_isrhqpa wrote

Oh, no, I didn't make an error. Your many bullshit stories have proven that much to be true.

It says something about me? I wonder what that could be. It would be funny to hear what assumptions you've made about me given that statement you just made about how it's an error to do so.

Edit: So brave

1

twombles21 t1_isrnzeq wrote

You can keep saying my “story is bullshit” but it’s not going to make that statement true.

So you want to complain about people making assumptions now? You can’t even see that your entire argument is based on an assumption and incorrect one at that.

You are not worth talking to. Enjoy the block shit bird.

1