Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TekkogsSteve t1_jear7vp wrote

This argument always falls so flat because your comparing private citizens of a country to literal sovereign wealth funds operated by the rulers of a state. The difference in the level of accountability for their respective governments atrocities should be obvious

31

Greenrico3 t1_jebf7ph wrote

So by that logic you should also believe that Roman abramovich shouldn't have had to sell Chelsea?

−11

Greenrico3 t1_jebf6s5 wrote

So by that logic you should also believe that Roman abramovich shouldn't have had to sell Chelsea?

−12

melancious t1_jec8mkb wrote

He's Putin's lackey. He shares the blame.

2

Greenrico3 t1_jed7k3q wrote

He is still not a part of the Russian government. He is as responsible for Russian war crimes as American owners are for america's.

−1

melancious t1_jedd2dv wrote

Bollocks. He worked as part of the government. He got rich thanks to the government. Football is a sportwashing project for him.

2