Submitted by PrincessBananas85 t3_1247u0j in sports
Comments
[deleted] t1_jdyhhu2 wrote
[removed]
LightningVole t1_jdyhz00 wrote
She’s entitled not to have people tell lies about her. Also, she shouldn’t be tied to a confidentiality agreement signed when she was a baby. She never agreed to that.
danxmanly t1_jdylqkx wrote
Yes... He promised her a Lombardi Trophy in the 2000's. Has yet to deliver.
bravetab t1_jdyn69l wrote
obik501 t1_jdynf9w wrote
I'm with you. She was getting PAID, for years. She had no issue with that. But when the money stopped, oh no, time to tap that gravy train again... This gal has gotten more money GIVEN to her than I have made my entire life. She can fuck off.
EternamD t1_jdyuo9r wrote
2000s **
You may be thinking of the apostrophe in '00s
porchpooper t1_jdyyde8 wrote
375K is not a lot money and it’s not like she saw much of it. That’s 20k in child support annually over 18 years. I pay more than 20k a year for daycare for one kid…
chronoboy1985 t1_jdz319x wrote
Nah. He’s making an educated guess about their future prospects.
drainisbamaged t1_jdz8nzj wrote
Hey look, it's a crab in a bucket
[deleted] t1_jdz93z4 wrote
[removed]
mrwaltwhiteguy t1_jdz9aip wrote
A simple cheek swab will settle it.
If he’s not her father, then we know that. If he is…. Well, don’t be a dickhead and have your lawyers settle or some such, and be done with it.
No one needed to know a single thing about this if Jerry had just done right by her in the first place and not been a giant piece of shit about it.
chocolate_thunderr89 t1_jdzdvm8 wrote
Wow she was one of Trumps aides? Enough said…
brett1081 t1_jdzg9y2 wrote
I mean I love someone not motivated by money that continuously sues for, you know, money.
Pktur3 t1_jdzja5c wrote
Idk, if he is her father and had been intentionally neglectful in raising her, why wouldn’t she be entitled to restitution? I mean plenty of deadbeats out there are sitting in jail over the lack of support, it shouldn’t be different here.
[deleted] t1_jdzjhn9 wrote
[removed]
Kidnovatex t1_jdzrrnl wrote
He's already admitted to being the father and has paid millions to her mother based on an agreement they signed years ago. You could call him a "deadbeat" for not wanting to be involved in her life, I suppose, but he's paid out plenty of money to give her a very good quality of living over the years.
Kidnovatex t1_jdzs1dp wrote
I think you're missing a big part of the agreement between the parties.
​
[deleted] t1_jdzsz2d wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jdzt3ii wrote
[deleted]
SoupOrSandwich t1_jdztg9h wrote
...yeah, millions of deadbeat parents do it.
Kidnovatex t1_jdzti4h wrote
Small installments? No, I'm saying that the woman was a consenting party when she chose to have sex with a married man, so there's fault on both sides. She also was a consenting party when she signed an NDA which included millions of dollars in payments from Jerry jones over the course of her daughter's childhood and college years. Does that make Jerry Jones a saint? No, obviously not, but it's not much different than if they had gotten divorced and she was given custody. He paid his child support payments.
El_mochilero t1_je0le6b wrote
“Come back to my hotel room, and I’ll give you our next Lombardi trophy.”
He has been using this line for decades, and it still hasn’t caught up with him.
dirtybird131 t1_je0nrx7 wrote
My guy, he's BEEN paying, did you even read the article? This bitch just decided he wasn't paying enough, despite a free ride thru college and a brand new Range Rover on her 16th Bday.
But honestly, it's probably less about the money and more about what being Jerry Jones' daughter could do for her political career
jorge1209 t1_je14r31 wrote
"the bitch" decided that the pocket change of a billionaire was not sufficient to offset the moral obligation to fulfill ones parental obligations.
I tend to agree with her. If Jerry Jones wants to make bastards of his children, then I'm all for those children taking every penny they can from him.
jorge1209 t1_je1lpbz wrote
The agreement Jones had with the mother is with the mother. It excuses Jones from any legal and moral obligation he has to her as a co-parent. It does not satisfies his moral obligations as the father to the child.
As a society we tend not to recognize that children have any kind of legal right to parental affection, but its pretty clear that Jones has opted not to fulfill that moral duty. He has given what amounts to pocket change to this girls mother, but no amount of money can substitute for not having a father.
Legally the woman cannot demand anything on the basis of that, but morally I'm all for her taking Jones for a ride. Fuck the guy. When you bastardize your own children, you are the bastard.
LightningVole t1_je2pktc wrote
What makes her a bitch? She’s suing for defamation, because they’d lied about her, and to free herself from a contract that she never signed. Why should she be bound by a contract she never agreed to?
Boggie135 t1_je4hr47 wrote
It says she was an aide in his white house. Not to him directly
Boggie135 t1_je4hva2 wrote
Did you read the article?
Boggie135 t1_je4izdr wrote
What the he does all this have to do with you?
obik501 t1_je6s72e wrote
Nothing. What does it have to do with you?? Almost 100% of everything posted on Reddit has nothing to do with anybody commenting on it. Get your panties out of a bunch.
[deleted] t1_jdy6psb wrote
[deleted]