Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_jakdac8 wrote

The latter is real evidence potentially if math works right. The former wouldn’t be enough

0

Wayyyy_Too_Soon t1_jake660 wrote

It’s all real evidence. Just because a single piece of information is not enough to justify a conviction, it doesn’t mean it doesn’t add to our overall understanding of what happened and would contribute to an eventual conviction, along with other pieces of evidence.

2

[deleted] t1_jaketd4 wrote

I meant the former wouldn’t be enough on its own. I am a lawyer

−2