NotFitToBeAParent t1_j9cj02k wrote
Reply to comment by Gavinski37 in UK calls on IOC to maintain Olympic ban on Russian and Belarusian athletes by rejs7
I'm assuming you're American? we were in a "active war" for 20 years, should our athletes not participated during those years?
I actually understand why Russia would be banned here. They've been caught doping many times. Is Belarus because of the Ukrainian thing? Not sure I understand. The athletes from those countries have nothing to do with the political musings of their countries leaders. Do you really think Belarus and Russia give two fucks about the Olympics when they are invading other countries? The Nazis participated in the 1936 Olympics. Just don't get where the line is here.
UrbanGhost114 t1_j9cz0qi wrote
We are in 6 according to the white house the last I checked.
scottydg t1_j9d2inv wrote
If you want to get technical, the US has not been at "War" since WWII. They have been in numerous "Military conflicts" or "peacekeeping operations" or whatever you want to call them, but it's not "War".
teabagmoustache t1_j9dso6i wrote
Couldn't Russia say the same? Technically, it's a special military operation. They're just phrases made up to avoid the use of the word war.
scottydg t1_j9e0w7m wrote
Sure, which they're allowed to do that. These definitions of "War" can be wrong.
Im2bored17 t1_j9d4pjv wrote
IIRC war requires an act of congress but the president can send troops wherever he wants for whatever reason, as long as the reason isn't "war".
scottydg t1_j9d6ndx wrote
Exactly. There are limitations to what the President can do as the Commander in Chief, but sending troops to places within the restrictions of the defense budget or what Congress authorizes through what has lately been the AUMF (Authorization of Military Force). These things are not "War", however.
michael_harari t1_j9f4n6l wrote
Maybe not war according to American law, but it's still a war.
scottydg t1_j9fklat wrote
Yep, I agree. There's a reason everyone was saying "the war in Afghanistan and Iraq", "Vietnam war", whatever you want to call those "conflicts", they were wars.
xixi2 t1_j9f4s2u wrote
The Judicial Branch is filled with lawyers and judges. The legislative branch is filled with politicians. I always thought the executive branch would logically be military (I mean it was for our first president I guess), not just more politicians that switched jobs
scottydg t1_j9fkdmk wrote
It is. The President is the Commander in Chief, who outranks everyone in the military, orders them to do things, all that. Congress controls spending and has the exclusive right to declare "War", which the President then uses to act with more power than under normal circumstances.
xixi2 t1_j9flb40 wrote
Yes I know. Which is why I meant like military officers should be the people we choose for the presidency. Not congress people that decided they wanna be president
ARedditingRedditor t1_j9fzsed wrote
Catch all is "extended military engagement "
Im2bored17 t1_j9d4wu7 wrote
"war" on drugs
"war" on terrorism
"war" on poverty
What are the others?
xixi2 t1_j9eq95t wrote
Don't even try lol. "Russia Bad!" Is all reddit knows while ignoring the US has been engaged in foreign intervention for decades
unwilling_redditor t1_j9fqpw2 wrote
When did "foreign intervention" become synonymous with a war of conquest and attempted genocide?
[deleted] t1_j9ffn6h wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments