Submitted by PrincessBananas85 t3_115wk7i in sports
dumb_commenter t1_j96pow6 wrote
Reply to comment by C3PD2 in Tiger Woods cards 4-under 67; best round to par since 2020. by PrincessBananas85
Agree with all that. But again if we’re talking dominance over a sport hard to limit to a single surface that represents a quarter of the season.
C3PD2 t1_j971vww wrote
Fair enough. For me, 14 titles in 17 years and 112-3 is the definition of dominance. The French Open is also a major - it's most certainly not just "a single open" - all the best players are playing each year.
To put it in golf terms; if Justin Thomas won the next 12 straight PGA Championships he would still have a lower win rate than Nadal at the French Open. To be that much better than all your peers - when your peers are both the other best players in history - is absurd.
dumb_commenter t1_j9722ag wrote
No objection here. He’s still one of the 3 I listed. Who are all only close to matched by one another.
CyborgBee t1_j9855ri wrote
The comparison to Thomas doesn't work at all. In tennis, a moderately better player wins 90%+ of the time. In golf, a better player outplaces a similarly worse player like 60% of the time. There is so much more randomness in golf
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments