Submitted by Ordinary-Toe-9855 t3_106jz1l in space
Comments
[deleted] t1_j3h1ado wrote
[removed]
bigloser42 t1_j3haq8n wrote
Since the odd of it hitting anyone on the planet is 1/9,400, wouldn’t the odds of it hitting me be (1/9,400)/8,000,000,000?
usernamesucks1992 t1_j3iaa24 wrote
I’ll take your word for it! I’m too lazy to do the math!
singlejeff t1_j3j13gf wrote
Better than that broken link someone posted earlier
Aw, the ‘updated tracking information page’ requires a login.
[deleted] t1_j3kaspj wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3kg3tl wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j3kjihn wrote
[removed]
james_otter t1_j3lcjht wrote
Better don’t use a budget satellite next time but get a premium one
stick_always_wins t1_j3lfhvj wrote
“Reenter” as opposed to “rain down from the skies in a fireball potentially killing thousands”, funny how language changes depending on the origin of the falling object. But then again I don’t think NASA would fear monger their own falling satellite haha
usernamesucks1992 t1_j3gzof1 wrote
So you have a better chance of being harmed by this satellite (1 in 9,400) then being struck by lighting (1 in 15,300).
Still not worried but - but watch yer heads! Lol