[deleted] OP t1_j6o7uvg wrote
Reply to comment by PandaEven3982 in If the concepts of Project Orion were proven, why don't we use them for space guns? by [deleted]
[deleted]
OwnLet6739 t1_j6obiua wrote
Yeah, you're just too smart. That's what it is.
McCaffeteria t1_j6oc47s wrote
You should add the /s so they don’t think you’re being serious
PandaEven3982 t1_j6ogb0i wrote
/s is sarcasm? Are there other letters in use?
PandaEven3982 t1_j6og4pa wrote
I can't actually tell if that's sarcasm/snark/other...or you meant it? If I'm smart, how come I don't know what /s means?
(What does/s mean? Gramps is asking for help)
OwnLet6739 t1_j6oua56 wrote
/s means sarcasm. Hard to read sarcasm through text. I was responding to OP though, not you.
PandaEven3982 t1_j6ov9kg wrote
Nods. Then thank you twice. :-)
[deleted] OP t1_j6onoky wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] OP t1_j6osbsw wrote
[removed]
PandaEven3982 t1_j6o9rwi wrote
Thank you. I'm not really sensitive to up/down voting yet. Lol and I'm weird enough I might never get there:-)
Do you mean as a payload or as a warshot? We are really close to fusion powered induction IMHO, but as a transport system or at least a bootstrapper....is my head following?
[deleted] OP t1_j6ooenm wrote
[deleted]
PandaEven3982 t1_j6oyqiz wrote
I keep thinking Buckminster Fullerene. And orbital elevator.
[deleted] OP t1_j6pay4j wrote
[deleted]
PandaEven3982 t1_j6pe1xn wrote
Ha. The elevator mount includes a layup maneuver. Catch the hook at Angels 20?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments