svarogteuse t1_j6nn0xt wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in If the concepts of Project Orion were proven, why don't we use them for space guns? by [deleted]
No the g-forces wont exclude humans. A proper Orion craft has a payload section and a pusher plate. The pusher plate and the payload are separated by massive shock absorbers to minimize the forces exerted on the payload.
>Two shock absorber designs were explored. The first consisted of three donut-shaped gas-filled cushions, each one meter high, looking like a stack of tires. Six-meter high aluminum pistons rose from these absorbers. This system would limit peak G forces to 3 to 4 G's. But it would be a bumpy ride for the passengers. Therefore the second design was more complex but allowed the shock absorbers to operate in synchronization in order to further even out the G-forces. This would limit peak forces to 1.5 to 2.0 G's.
1.5 -2.0 Gs is less than the 6Gs of early rockets and the 3 of the shuttle.
$200k and radiation over an area, downwind from the fallout and environmental damage noticeable across the world. We didnt stop Orion strictly because of the treaty. If it had been viable (ie worth the environmental damage) we would have negotiated it into the treaty.
[deleted] OP t1_j6nntob wrote
[deleted]
svarogteuse t1_j6npt7i wrote
What you are looking for is explicitly spelled out in the Space gun article that I already linked and you couldn't find in the section Technical Issues.
>the acceleration would theoretically be more than 1,000 m/s2 (3,300 ft/s2), which is more than 100 g-forces, which is about 3 times the human tolerance to g-forces of maximum 20 to 35 g[5]
[deleted] OP t1_j6nq0kw wrote
[deleted]
svarogteuse t1_j6nqr8d wrote
You are the one looking for help. Read the footnotes. Do the math. Stop telling people they are dumb because of your own laziness and ignorance. The information is right in front of you. Not our problem that you dont want to believe it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments